Very good take on the image, The feel of the original is far less apocalyptic than yours, and i prefer the colours here Reply »

Reply:

Thanks! Reply »

Reply:

Fantastic! I don't think that I can make anything that can come close! Reply »

Reply:

Really good image. I would say its the year 2285.Technology accelerates due to increase in population. Top 3 for sure. Reply »

Reply:

feels kinda like this: http://forcg.com/tutorials/modeling/create-an-awesome-3d-future-city-day-1/ Reply »

Reply:

great work,gl Reply »

Reply:

yeah.. gr8 job and u have perfectly followed the procedure of the tutorial..lighting is very gud..i just want you to make it clear abt the render engine u used ,how u got thhose light rays..did u made it with the photoshop filters..sbs is lagging in material and rendering section ..and also the lighting part in the center sphere.overall itz a gr8 work..gl Reply »

Reply:

good one. gl Reply »

Reply:

Thanks everyone. @Lodd, yeah, as I said, I used that kinda layout for my work, cause I liked it most of the 3 I mentioned. @ramananjv - thanks I did not follow it step by step, I used some of the techniques both from it and others. As I said in the last step, the sky is one polygon (picture in source), with a gradient opacity map, from the bottom to the top, and some alterations to the gradient shade positions. Render engine.... Uhhh, I have no idea what that is. :lol: I just modeled it, set up the render resolution and rendered it. I think it's the default 3ds Max render? Reply »

Reply:

Oh, and about the lighting in the center building, I just positioned free lights in the 'windows' or whatever they are. I think the picture in SBS tells enough about where they are positioned. =) Reply »

Reply:

wow!! Seems real...What is the building in the centre? Reply »

Reply:

nice composition Reply »

Reply:

interesting Reply »

Reply:

Thanks everyone! =) The building in the center.... Hmmm, I don't know, I guess it's something important that runs the whole city? Reply »

Reply:

Good job except for a few straight lines in the clouds at upper right that pull the eye there... Reply »

Reply:

Thanks. The sky an image downloaded from the net, so.... Don't be so nitpicky here, this is 3D modeling, not Photoshopping =P =) Reply »

Reply:

awsome. Reply »

Reply:

Thanks =) Reply »

Reply:

great work author Reply »

Reply:

Nice work, author! Reply »

Reply:

Nice Mood Reply »

Reply:

good perspective! Reply »

Reply:

I do like it...awesome! Reply »

Reply:

i would have been more impressed if you learnt the tutorial then made something you could call your own design. To me this is just copying someones art. Tutorials are only there to teach, not to take credit for. Reply »

Reply:

Well, I don't know if I can agree or disagree with you. This is not a unique piece, but neither is the tutorial, TBH. I mean, really - A big city with circular composition with a cool building in the center... Classic. Also, as I said, I didn't follow the tut, I just liked it's design. But thanks anyway, here's a goldie thumb for you. =D Reply »

Reply:

congrats Reply »

Reply:

Well done Wlado. Reply »

Reply:

Tnx All =) Reply »

Reply:

Fantastic! Reply »

Reply:

Tnx! =D Reply »

Reply:

I do like it, it looks good in LO-res, but it's impossible to review any details.. so, please render a bigger HI-res version! Reply »

Reply:

PLEEEEASE don't make me do it, there are millions of polygons there! =(( To be more precise 3927095. So you can be sure there's a lot of detail =D This took me like an hour to render 800x600.... Imagine how much would 1280 x 1024 take me. Do I REALLY have to do it? Reply »

Reply:

Are you kidding me - an hour?! That's nothing when it comes to one frame 3D rendering! My late test render usually takes about an hour and my final at least 4H!

C'mon now, crank up the details and let the CPU burn over night. There's plenty of time until deadline. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's curious about the details.


(About the poly-count, I know the feeling. I'm sure 3DSMax has some sort of polygon reducing function) Reply »

Reply:

I saw your little problem, if you dont mind..1. you have Optimize modifier, this can reduce 20-30 % poly whitout visibile quality loose 2. according SBS you made„few planes”. why ?can make a single plane, convert to Edit Poly or Mesh, apply displacement map and then,for adjusment, select one or more poly (see also Soft selection) and move on Yaxis with Move tool. This will take few minutes more than displacement but will reduce dramatically poly number and render time. And you will have a full control of how your planet will look. Reply »

Reply:

OK, OK. Actually, it didn't take me an hour more like 20 minutes Anyway, I'm rendering it now, it'll be done in a few minutes. =) @your comments, well, I don't want to reduce polycount because of the details, and I'm just to lazy (read: have no idea how) to make normal maps =P I made a few planes because I have had several displacement maps, I didn't mix them all in PS. And I could never manage to do something this detailed with Edit Poly. Well, maybe with Edit Poly and some Normal/Bumps and Displacements, but nothing with edit poly onnly =) Thanks anyway! Here comes high-res! Reply »

Reply:

Here! It's finished! =D Satisfied? But really, what's there to see? Nothing so important that it has to be high res... =) =P Reply »

Reply:

I'm glad you spent the enormous amount of time to re-render it! By doing that the great ground texture is visible.

The only flaw I can see is that you've applied it planar - stretching it when it gets steep. You could fix this by making UV-textures, adding a displacing texture on steep parts, or simply reproduce a similar effect with procedural bump and color textures. But don't get me wrong, I still like it. Reply »

Reply:

Hmmmmm, yeah, it does get stretched... Tho I must say I kinda like the effect.... =P Especially at these high.... whatever they are? =D But OK, I'll bother with UV mapping a bit, and see what I get. Thanks! =) Reply »

Reply:

nice image well done. Reply »

Reply:

Tnx Missy. =) Reply »

Reply:

Author: nooo, don't change to UV if you like the present result. If that's the result you wanted to achieve then that's what it is. In that case you could enchance the melted effect by adding an adjusted version of the ground texture image to fit as a bump and/or diffuse map. Reply »

Reply:

Already did that Bump map is the same texture with a little higher contrast. But thanks for the constructive comment! =) Reply »

Reply:

Great work but Saturn would be a lot crisper/sharper if it was that close. Nice job though. Reply »

Reply:

nice image,gl Reply »

Reply:

Good work. Reply »

Reply:

boring hU? not boring to the eye... Reply »

Reply:

Congrats for your second place, Wlado! Reply »

Reply:

Congratulations for 2nd Reply »

Reply:

Tnx everyone =) Reply »

Reply:

Congatulations! Reply »

Reply:

Love this...mix of library and astronomy tower...well done author Reply »

Reply:

nice Reply »

Reply:

Thanks =) Reply »

Reply:

very nice.gl. Reply »

Reply:

Nice! Things seem a little bit too glossy, maybe it has to do with the lighting? But other than that, it looks great! I like it a lot! Reply »

Reply:

Nah, I really like the reflections and glossyness. =) I actually like how you can see the entire room in the reflection on the globe and so =) Reply »

Reply:

Cool! There could be a little hint of reflected light, a highlight, or even a glow that bounce off the walls due to the flames of the furthest object, to help the lighting look a bit more realistic than it looks now. Very nice entry! Reply »

Reply:

Yeah, you're absolutely right. =) I don't have time to fix it tho =/ Have to go to a party now =) Reply »

Reply:

nice image. Reply »

Reply:

Tnx! =) Reply »

Reply:

All of the large planet would be visible, even the dark side... Reply »

Reply:

Why? The dark side blends with the sky, and clouds are in front of the planet, so that's why they can be seen Reply »

Reply:

interesting. like the effect of the image. Reply »

Reply:

The fainted planet looks as if it stands in front of the clouds. Reply »

Reply:

read the sbs and you'll se why If you know how to help me with this, please say. =) Reply »

Reply:

Planet has to be behind the clouds! Also, scale of the background & forground water is incompatible. Reply »

Reply:

I know the planet has to be behind, but I did this in 3ds Max using Vue plugin, and I can't figure out how to put it behind... And the water is one part, one big plane, so I'm pretty much sure the size is OK =P Reply »

Reply:

I dont know much about 3d construct but i like the overall image. GL Reply »

Reply:

Nice, i like it Reply »

Reply:

Thanks =) Reply »

Reply:

I love the contrast in this piece; 'cold' dead trees, and a 'warm' yellow sun. Reply »

Reply:

Thanks =) Reply »

Reply: