Active Forum Topics




    Re: Introducing Myself

  • Hi everybody I am new member of Pxleyers. From Netherlands. Web designer with 4 years experience. [url:2w30mewc]http://thebitcoinstrip.org/[/url:2w30mewc]

  • from: alexvetrov

  • [quote="BWR":2u9hxnwn]I know this is old but there is a much much much much better way. I use "Session Manager" in Firefox. What this does is is saves sessions. Sometimes I will have 50, 100, or even more tabs open while searching for images for a Photoshop. I can save this entire session as lets say "Dog Photoshop" or w/e. Sometimes I change plans midstream and decide to make something else. I can then make ""Dog Photoshop2" session and I still have the original session in case I wanna go back.[/quote:2u9hxnwn] What's Firefox? ;-)

  • from: CMYK46

  • [quote="BWR":1jsw28a4][quote="skyangel":1jsw28a4]I am wondering if premade downloaded actions are allowed to be used in contests? I have personally never used them because I thought they were someone elses work and it would be better to do the effect ourselves from scratch, even if we make our own actions from the steps to use in future contests. At least that way, people reading sbs will learn how to achieve the same effect. Just curious because if we are allowed to use them, I have a few I would most likely use in future contests without needing to provide an sbs as to how they are done.[/quote:1jsw28a4] That is so horrible if someone uses a pre-made action. That's sorta like "Let me Photoshop this for you BWR. Then you can click a button and say you did it."[/quote:1jsw28a4] I agree with you BWR but I understand what Rob is saying. Very few make an SBS to explain how they actually made their entries so if they use a premade action and dont make an SBS, there is no way to prove it. Not everyone will admit to buying a premade action but personally I would mark an entry lower if they admit to using a premade action and higher if they actually showed in the sbs how they achieved the end result which is achieved by that action. Most effects are not that hard to do and there are plenty of you tube tutorials to teach how to do them. I just think using purchased premade actions is a lazy way out. That's just my opinion.

  • from: skyangel

  • [quote="robvdn":38spi9zj]1. At http://www.pxleyes.com/courses/guide/guide.pdf page 9 you find more info on the mods. - Update on this guide: Friiskiwi and Tordoni are no mods anymore. 2. Mods do not get assigned contests anymore, all photomods can mod all photo entries and all photoshop mods all photoshop entries. - Advantage of this is that entries get modded faster. 3. If there's doubts or disagreements about a warning and or removal this is discussed between the mods. 4. http://www.pxleyes.com/other/the-eye/eye03.pdf page 74-79 you can find members asking questions to mods. It's explains a lot about how mods work. Any questions? Just ask![/quote:38spi9zj] "mods work"? They do? Haha.. just busting your cohones. Thanks for all your heard work around here Rob Van Damme. That's my nickname for you. I just made this for you. could have done a better job at extracting him but too lazy. One day I will. https://streamable.com/8498h

  • from: BWR

  • According to all the latest versions of Adobe Reader supported for different operating systems, I installed the application following the version name on my AOL desktop. When I faced the installation issue I checked [url=https://emailssupports.com/aol-support/:15rga0tb]AOL support[/url:15rga0tb] and performed all the rules so that I do not face any issue while the installation.

  • from: vmoses77

  • Have you changed your password? I have tried changing on my account and I think it is easy. You can go to your account just like some people mentioned here. Cheer,

  • from: petersh

  • [quote="solkee":27wfc39g]It would be a pity to see you leave but you must do what you feel best. I very rarely vote in the 3D section due to time constraints and my lack of knowledge in the subject. The results is up to the members, they vote the way they think is correct. The mods have nothing at all to do with the final outcome. The mods don't remove votes unless it is a blatant attempt to manipulate the score (eg. voting 1-10% on all entries in which that person has an entry). If the mods removed votes which they disagreed with then the mods would be manipulating the scores and that is not allowed and certainly not done. We have all had entries that have finished lower than what we believe they should have, unfortunately the rest of the members didn't agree with us. Maybe it wasn't the rest of the members that got it wrong, maybe it was our belief in where the entry should have finished that was wrong. What I am saying is don't cry fowl just because you see the results differently. We have many members from very different cultures, art styles, education and so on which view things very differently. Therefore they will also vote very differently. [color=#FF0040:27wfc39g][color=#FF0040][b:27wfc39g]To sum up I wouldn't pay $10 for some of the $1000000 artworks in museums, does that mean they are crap? It just means that they are not to my taste and if they were in a contest here at pxleyes I would vote them low.[/b:27wfc39g][/color:27wfc39g][/color][/quote:27wfc39g] I know this is an old thread but I have just read it and I agree with what I highlighted in red from the above quote. I think that in the end, art is very subject and no matter how valuable someone else might think it is, our own personal taste is what makes the final judgement of what is personally appreciated and of value to us personally.

  • from: skyangel

  • hi guy, just for sharing this site have provide some material about 3d models, texture and other template, specially for freebie can improve skills. enjoy it! Cheer! [url:2pmbmpkt]https://www.all3dfree.net[/url:2pmbmpkt] [url:2pmbmpkt]https://www.all3dfree.net/3d-texture-library.html[/url:2pmbmpkt]

  • from: jacoblee84

  • Welcome aboard, :YMHUG: this is really a fun place and in the process of having fun one can learn a lot from some of the titans on this site. Please do not be shy to critique works, what makes it work for you and what doesn't, that way we can all grow in our craft. All the best. Still26

  • from: still26

  • Yes, for sure to comment on each entry would be time consuming and oftentimes not appreciated all that much "what do YOU know?" or "I know all that" kinda attitude. BUT, for some a bit of a suggestion on how to improve is appreciated. I welcome all suggestions for improvement, even if I don't agree with the reviewer. :-)

  • from: still26

  • Hi Rebecca, :-H I am here to learn from other artists as well. Please don't be shy to give a critique when you see the posts, it is the ony way we can learn. Hoping to grow together in our craft. From Still26

  • from: still26

  • [quote="CMYK46":33yq02jv]Okay, here goes. Even though this subject has been brought up previously, as Spaceranger mentioned, (He has posted older links) I'd like to thank Irse for bringing it up again. It's important for ALL members, not just newbies. And as mentioned, the following criteria are absolutely essential to consider when evaluating an entry: • Masking issues - edges left around component sources or sections that should have been masked and weren't. • Shadows - absence of or inappropriate direction or strength. • Lighting\Levels - mismatched levels or light sources of components. • Blending techniques & Filters - Inappropriate use of such that it overwhelms or becomes the focal point of the piece. I'd like to add some thoughts to these. Masking: edges that are too sharp, jagged, or pixelated = lower vote. Shadows: I'd add wrong opacity to that list. Lighting/Levels: Light sources are usually simple to determine when choosing images. Many members pay little or no attention to this when making a composite. Lower vote. Other things I take into consideration when voting, in no particular order: SBS. A step-by-step guide isn't mandatory, but I agree with Spaceranger that a good one is the best way to demonstrate the work that went into your entry. Looking at a good SBS over the years has certainly helped sharpen my skills, and I usually try to include at least a rudimentary one in my entries where I think it might be useful. Composition: A good idea expressed in a poor composition won't get a lot of points from me. Mood: Whether by color, lighting, good choice of subject matter, or all three, a well done moody piece can be impressive. Humor: Tasteful humor is a joy to see. Crude, not so much. Use of source: Obviously a creative use of the source will get a better vote than just slapping on some filters or overlaying other images. And here we come to CBR. Entries that are Chopped Beyond Recognition. Using Warp and Liquify to create something that bears no visible relation to the source gets a WOW vote from lots of members. I just scratch my head. To me it's being clever, not necessarily creative, and is a questionable use of the source because an identical recreation could be made with some other source. Some people love it, others share my opinion. Lastly, and purely subjective, how does the entry make me feel? Is it the same old tired stuff I've seen a million times? Does it make me think? Does it make me say "Wow, I wish I had thought of that?" Does it uplift or disgust me? Is it so good I go back to view it just for fun? I may have overlooked a few things, but to me all these things are important and I vote accordingly.[/quote:33yq02jv] I agree with pretty much everything in this post. Humor to me is about as important and any other "emotion" or "feel" that I may get from the chop. Of course if I look at an image and it makes me laugh, I may give it more points, but the same can be said if it makes me "feel" whatever. I do tend to give extra for an SBS. To me that shows effort and the amount of effort someone used to make their chop is important to me. Heck, even a nice description on how it was made is a good thing to me. I never judge by looking at an image (particularly just the low-res) and giving it a score. I look at all their sources and see what they actually did. At first glance something may look good but when you look at the sources used and they just copy/pasted a few things here and there, then the "initial impression score" I may have had in my head, goes lower. Or it may go higher if the opposite occurs. I mostly spend several minutes scoring each one. And like you, I use pretty much use all of your criteria while doing so. I even look at the Hi-res for errors such as masking etc. I can see that that hub-cap (or w/e) the artist used as an eye is blended in well or did they just copy and paste it there and do nothing to blend it? Also I would like to say that I do appreciate all of your critique in the Chop contests. I've actually learned from your critique so keep up the good work. I may not have my terms right here but mismatch in "temperature" is a pet peeve of mine. Someone may take a warm image and put it into an "cooler" scene and make no effort to adjust it. It gives the chop that "I'm just gonna stick this thing here and hope for the best" look "but take no effort to match it up". Sometimes those adjustments are hard to do, but sometimes they are simple. I'm making up numbers here but that could turn a 50 into a 60 or w/e if everything just looks like it belongs together. Also perspective. I've seen some really good chops but the external sources just don't look like they belong there. Heck, sometime using that same eternal and moving it back or forward may cure that problem, sometimes they should not even have tried to use that external. [b:33yq02jv]CMYK46 "Is it the same old tired stuff I've seen a million times?"[/b:33yq02jv] As of right now, IMO, I think I may disagree with this. I have not been into this for very long so I have not seen things a million times. One of my first contest entries was a dragon made from a frog. Someone in the comments said something like "We have already seen millions of dragons". I haven't. That was MY dragon damnit haha. I poured my heart and soul into that dragon, not eating or sleeping to make the best dragon I could, so the fact that there may have been 10 million billion trillion dragons made before, to me, should be of no consequence.

  • from: BWR

  • [quote="WillieLofton":2kf6uii0]I also like to take night photos! See these tips - [url:2kf6uii0]http://weedit.photos/2017/how-to-edit-night-photos-in-photoshop/[/url:2kf6uii0] What do you think about this, it's beautiful?[/quote:2kf6uii0] Great tips Willie. Thanks for sharing.

  • from: skyangel

  • Must have been lost on it's journey. I don't have a tracking number anymore for it, it's over 5 years ago. Think we should consider this, sadly, lost.

  • from: robvdn

  • https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... es+for+web

  • from: CMYK46

  • Does this http://www.pxleyes.com/photography-pict ... spair.html show any for you?

  • from: robvdn

  • [quote="BlareCruz21":3vr87nyg]ANY TIPS? on how to start Photoshop Cs6 I just installed it today. I don't even know how to crop picture properly I just erase the entire background. I don't know where to start from a scratch. Any help would be much appreciated![/quote:3vr87nyg] https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... p+tutorial

  • from: CMYK46

  • Hi, guys any of you want to have books like these. I know it's a bit off topic about Photoshop and anything but you might be interested! 1. The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself by Michael Singer 2. Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl 3. Falling in Love With Where You Are: A Year of Prose and Poetry on Radically Opening Up to the Pain and Joy of Life by Jeff Foster 4. The Four Agreements: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom by Don Miguel Ruiz 5. You Are Doing a Freaking Great Job: And Other Reminders of Your Awesomeness by Workman Publishing I'm sure these books are worth getting. You can try to go this site [url:fz09jtqm]https://ponbee.com/self-love-books/[/url:fz09jtqm] offer various books in the different genre. Thank you CMYK46 for the repost. :X

  • from: BlareCruz21

  • [quote="CMYK46":2syh8dbx][quote="BlareCruz21":2syh8dbx]Try reading these books, you might be interested! 1. The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself by Michael Singer 2. Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor E. Frankl 3. Falling in Love With Where You Are: A Year of Prose and Poetry on Radically Opening Up to the Pain and Joy of Life by Jeff Foster 4. The Four Agreements: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom by Don Miguel Ruiz 5. You Are Doing a Freaking Great Job: And Other Reminders of Your Awesomeness by Workman Publishing I'm sure these books are worth getting. You can try to go this site [url:2syh8dbx]https://ponbee.com/self-love-books/[/url:2syh8dbx]. they offer various books in the different genre.[/quote:2syh8dbx] I'm sure these books are admirable, but not relevant to the topic. You might want to start a separate thread for stuff like this.[/quote:2syh8dbx] I understand sir. Thank you.

  • from: BlareCruz21

  • Happy belated bday SPACERANGER!!!!

  • from: BWR

  • OMG you were in Islamarada? that was pretty close to the heart of things.

  • from: BWR

  • I think this is a great idea, in addition I would like to recommend http://fixthephoto.com/ because there are many useful tips for editing photos. All these materials are free!

  • from: WillieLofton

  • Post a "question" on the eBay page and ask why they stole your art. Probably won't stop it, but potential buyers will see it.

  • from: kyricom

  • Hey George. I know I'm late but happy birthday man. You got another one coming soon.

  • from: BWR

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VT-SFgkVlno

  • from: lchappell

  • [quote="robvdn":3tbziza4]Thanks Rein \M/[/quote:3tbziza4] Oh my. I gotta check out this forum more often. Happy belated one brother.

  • from: BWR

  • Thanks SR. A wealth of information!! :YMHUG: :YMAPPLAUSE: :-BD Bookmarked.

  • from: BWR

  • [quote="spaceranger":q375nbu0]Basically it's very straightforward, the voting scale 0f 0% to 100% is used worldwide to rate anything that can be evaluated, from tests you take in school to contests like ours where you rate the entry based on various factors. I vote mainly on Photoshop contests because that's my main interest and I vote carefully and examine the work considering many different aspects and how well they contribute to the final work. I consider 50% my starting point when evaluating, I look to see the work done, was the masking/silo work clean? Is the composition good? I also look for Color, Originality, use of the source or interpretation of the theme and lastly the final appeal or do I like the image? That isn't always as important to me as the combined value of the other factors to consider. I rarely vote lower than 45%. 55-60% is a fairly good entry, 65-70% a really good entry, 75% and more an excellent entry. I never vote 100% because realistically no entry is perfect. You'll find a forum post about voting here: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=5669 This post will give you an idea of how some members vote and what they consider important. There is no hard and fast rule as to how you should vote, it's up to you how to vote but you'll get a better understanding what others think if you read the post.[/quote:q375nbu0] I agree, 55- 60 is a decent vote. Consider the believable aspects, good shadows and lighting. Technique, such as masking/blending efforts. Of course it's artistic appeal will always matter.

  • from: lchappell

  • Check it out here: http://www.pxleyes.com/courses/best-ps- ... e-painter/

  • from: robvdn

  • Check it out here: http://www.pxleyes.com/courses/best-pho ... er-of-on1/

  • from: robvdn