I like this one, definitely makes you wonder what you had in mind here. = ) Reply »
(1 year and 274 days ago)
The smoke brushes are under a creative commons lisense and are usable.
extra sources:
http://www.cgtextures.com/texview.php?id=34389&PHPSESSID=0c5af4344af9fffc501e97d2905cd3de (Thanks to Cgtextures) (1 year and 274 days ago)
Hmm...this is strange...bizarre...with a touch of Terry Gilliam. I love it!
Reply »
Supposed to be mind challenging, huh??? This really is!! Great work! Reply »
(1 year and 271 days ago)
Beautiful work! There just seems to be a bit of a strange chunk missing from the top-right part of the tree. You did an awesome job on the rest... Reply »
(1 year and 232 days ago)
You never know what kind of surrealism can come out of some pictures. (1 year and 240 days ago)
Well, thank you all for your very polite comments! Gopankarichal, this was not really Deviantart inspired, but I just have this habit of creating surreal images out of sources one would never expect to turn into a surrealistic entry. Erathion...thanks. Reply »
I really loved this work, author!
Make us believe that the creativity is infinite and the Photoshop in right hands can do magic!
I loved the SBS, as well.
Congratulations! Reply »
Hi Author, my comment was not a criticism. your habit of creating surreal images is appreciative. Create a series of works like that and upload in the album or you can do exhibitions. Good luck Reply »
this is very nice Author. You have improved so much. I am impressed
Reply »
Grumple Grumple gruff gruff.. doesn't look anything like a tuna sandwich... grumple grumple (hee hee hee) great job Reply »
STUNNING. Your stuff is getting better by the entry...
Congrats indeed, well deserved.
Reply »
(1 year and 268 days ago)
This is a perfect entry with the source image.., well done.. good luck
Reply »
Pretty well done. Tiny suggestion: I'm not sure if it's the blur or the lens flare, but the top of the tower seems to be a bit blurry/ has less contrast than under. Is it an idea to make the right side of the top of the tower somewhat darker & sharper (by masking away the lensflare from that side, on the left side it's ok), this way you may create more depth and it will stand out more against the background (I guess my eye gets older, but for some reason I thought that the towertop was part of the background, that's why). For the rest appealing result. Good luck! Reply »
I really think it is a fantastic job!
Great mood and very well done.
I loved the final colors.
Congratulations Author. Reply »
Here id the link to the page i got after searching "surreal castle" http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=surreal+castle&z=t&l=deriv&mt=photos&adv=1 (1 year and 290 days ago)
Nice moody feel and pleasant enough, but I don't know what I should be focusing on. Also, the landscape seems pretty realistic to me (aside from the miniature foreground tower [or giant background pagoda]), so I don't get the reference to 'surrealism' in your title. Reply »
I would do bit more work with the foreground tower blending, it looks like it's sunk to the ground and also the perspective with the tree is a bit weird. It looks like the base is in behind the tree or at the same depth, but the upper part is in front.
Overall it IS a bit surrealistic, so I'm ok with the title. Good colours and mood, worth tweaking a bit more. Reply »
i dont know its just what it gave me when i used advanced search with small screen view...but that makes no diffeence...i guess they just fit all the pics on one page:0 Reply »
(1 year and 260 days ago)
Idea has potential, but CMYK46 is right that the upper-left orange-sky light doesn't match the constrained, white right-side light creating the shadow. Furthermore, a "pathway of darkness" that leads to a dramatic sunset is not particularly foreboding. Reply »
Adding the streetlight gives more sense to the lighting (although it might be counter to the notion of 'pathway to darkness'). The bug trails in the light (if that's what that 'bird's nest' is meant to be) seem to be excessive, especially when the longer photo exposure they imply seems slightly inconsistent with the crispness of the moving guy. Visible stars seem unrealistic shining through the sunset, made more so by the lack of stars appearing in the dark upper-right corner. Reply »
Wow, Dan... your comments sting...I sure am glad you only have 100 vp then
Reply »
Author, there are a couple of pompous asses on this site, who seem to ALWAYS intentionally give negative feedback, hoping to influence the voters. They must have been raised by wolves, because they have absolutely no couth whatsoever. One of you pounces on newly uploaded work like stink on sh**! You two know who you are, and a lot of us wish you'd either mend your ways or go find another sandbox to play in, in fact why don't you start your own?! Some of us try to learn here, and your remarks do nothing to assist in that direction. The work that you two post is nothing fantastic by any means, either, so who are you to criticise others' work the way you do?
I find this chop very nice. The stars in the sky are REAL, it's a photograph. The 'paths' of the lightningbugs are also REAL, that also is a photograph. The shadow cast by the light is done well, and looks realistic. The blending of the sky and lamp I think is also done well. Keep up the good work, author.
And by the way, you two - comments CAN be edited, in case you didn't know - especially if you see that the author has made changes after first uploading. Reply »
well, just my two cents... the insects around the light are a bit too many, imo. the light is too high to cast the shadow as is. that is just math. but... the chop is wonderful! i like the mood and the composition. on a side note, i usually find that their observations are accurate and they have a great technical knowledge. and... any comment is much better than none at all... just my opinion.
good luck, i think you have a sound entry, it could be better, as could most, but it is really very good - smiles! Reply »
Haha , well, I am deeply "sorry" if I have offended anyone by creating this image, but I myself find that their comments are NOT accurate according to their own images. Reply »
I like this one! Very moody. But I feel sadness instead of darkness (but thinking well it's all the same...). I agree with lvstealth that if you reduce the insects flying around the lamp it would be better, IMO. And you know you have talent, don't worry!
Reply »
New life in the Pond of Dead Trees. (1 year and 285 days ago)
thanks Langstrum and Nasirkhan! made some tweaks...im more happy with it now, @ Nasir, i like the sky like it is, i like the colors, but thank you for the comment! much appreciated
Reply »
Beautiful image...a great surrealistic effect. Would be cleaner if there was perhaps a little more grass emerging from the front of the tree rather than just out to the sides. Otherwise this is probably my favourite entry here, so far. Nice work an good luck! Reply »
for the sky, it is copyrighted but, the author authorized useage of the image as long as i gave credit to them...credit to ~Mourge-Stawk on Deviantart.com
It is nightmarish because the cars are coming back from the junkyard to kill them some humans. (1 year and 298 days ago)
Great image and very well blended, my only thoughts are that if you added some rust texture to the wings that might have integrated them a little better (only IMO). Great chop. Reply »
Very appealing image, but I don't see the 'revenge' part (critical to the 'nightmarish' requirement of the contest). [Maybe noxious CO2 emissions out the tail pipes?
] Reply »
It is nightmarish because the cars are coming back from the junkyard to kill them some humans. Reply »
go to Tuckinator's profile
The nr. 1 graphics community on the web!
If you have a passion for graphics or photography, you came to the right place! Pxleyes is THE place to be for graphical artists and photographers. We have a large community of like-minded people.
We run over 20 new contests each week. We have something for everyone... Photoshop contests, photography contests, drawing contests and 3D contests.
Participation is 100% free and you can win great prizes!
On top of all that, we offer you the possibility to upload and categorize all your artwork and photography!
What are you waiting for? Signup now for free to start your pxleyes journey!
© 2012 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.











cool.. i like it... Reply »
(1 year and 265 days ago)
A few conflicting light sources, but it's still a sweet job...good luck.
Reply »
(1 year and 265 days ago)
Very cool I like this, it's sure is surrealism. Reply »
(1 year and 265 days ago)
nice.. and funny too Reply »
(1 year and 265 days ago)
strawberry giraffe..yummy.i like it Reply »
(1 year and 264 days ago)
I'm with EmiK: This really feels like surrealism! Shortening leg 2 would make the giraffe appear more like it's standing on the rounded surface of the strawberry. Reply »
(1 year and 264 days ago)
Purely surreal!
Reply »
(1 year and 264 days ago)
purely is correct
Great job Author
This is nice to watch you improve so much.
Good luck Reply »
(1 year and 264 days ago)
Great job author...i adore final product...well done Reply »
(1 year and 263 days ago)
like the work on the images in the foreground -- seem a bit pasted onto the background however -- maybe a background with some more depth?? Reply »
(1 year and 263 days ago)
Wow it's awesome now! Great work and good luck, author. Reply »
(1 year and 262 days ago)
fantastic work author, i think its time to start the genetic enginering to make it real Reply »
(1 year and 261 days ago)
fantastic work author, i think its time to start the genetic enginering to make it real Reply »
(1 year and 261 days ago)
Very good. Reply »
(1 year and 260 days ago)
fantastic..........
Reply »
(1 year and 260 days ago)
Awesome, my favorite part is the chain limbs. Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
wow, I really did not expect this one! Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats, it's a great image! Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats for your first place, Tucker! Great job!
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congratulations, Tucker!!! I think we were racing at the home stretch!!! Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Tucker, congrats! The changes were simply fantastic!
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats Tucker
Fabulous work Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats, dude, you're kicking some serious butt!
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats! for 1st place. Fantastic work
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats Tucker! and thank you for making girafferry, so delicious
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats Tucker...
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats!
Reply »
(1 year and 259 days ago)
Congrats!! Reply »
(1 year and 258 days ago)
congrats
Reply »
(1 year and 257 days ago)
eeekkkkk... sorry about not commenting.. great job.. (totally missed this one..
) Reply »
(1 year and 256 days ago)
Very well done, congrats on your win! Reply »
(1 year and 252 days ago)