- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Photography and photoshop contests
We are a community of people with
a passion for photography, graphics and art in general.
Every day new photoshop
and photography contests are posted to compete in. We also have one weekly drawing contest
and one weekly 3D contest!
Participation is 100% free!
Just
register and get
started!
Good luck!
© 2015 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.

Very funny ! Good luck author
(4 years and 229 days ago)Congrats Wyndham. This is a beautiful chop
(4 years and 271 days ago)Congrats wyndham. Townhouses in a field of grass.
(4 years and 271 days ago)Congrats Wyndham
(4 years and 278 days ago)congrats !
(4 years and 278 days ago)Good work. Congrats.
(4 years and 278 days ago)Genial !
(4 years and 282 days ago)I like your idea.....
(4 years and 282 days ago)Lovely
(4 years and 283 days ago)Very good job !
(4 years and 288 days ago)ACK! Who folded the photo! EEEEKKK... (great job)
(4 years and 288 days ago)ACK! also.. by enlarging it, you could fiddle with the distort/perspective of it (again, in the 10 percent range) and it would give it more stability.. then again, live monkeys could fly out my butt.. don't spend too much time on it if it's not worth it to you..
Thank you very much for considering my advice, it means more than you know 
(4 years and 311 days ago)I think what's causing you trouble is it's size, if you enlarged it and brought it more forward into the image, it would make it's perspective less obvious.. it's very small (you could enlarge it to complete a triangle (think of Jesus in the Last Supper by Leonardo)... now it's just a suggestion, but if you enlarged it triple it's size (yes I know that sounds big) but it would lock the whole image together by creation a giant triangle, pulling the whole image together... ack.. it's been years since design class.. so I could be a total nutter, but I think if you visualize it (the grinder) larger, you could see what I'm talking about
(4 years and 311 days ago)Your perspective is a bit wonky... but this is a surreal still life so I guess anything goes.. it's just that meat grinder is on a level plane while the floor boards are really tilting forward.. it's a great chop, but I think if you changed the perspective on the board, it would ground the objects tighter (Distortion works when only about 10 percent is alter, after that the image looks manipulated)
(4 years and 312 days ago)congratulations
(4 years and 315 days ago)Congrats !
(4 years and 316 days ago)Congrats Wyndham
(4 years and 320 days ago)Hahaha. A trick!
(4 years and 320 days ago)It's the best one for sure.
(4 years and 320 days ago)Kongrets on 1st wyndham. Your first win?
(4 years and 320 days ago)Battle bugs. So who won the fight?
(4 years and 320 days ago)Professional looking work! Lovely.
(4 years and 322 days ago)CRISP!
(4 years and 327 days ago)Think you should let some structure of the skin come through
(4 years and 327 days ago)Rut Roh!
(4 years and 328 days ago)Technically source 1 is not posted in the DA stock area, but it's offered as stock so we'll allowed it.
(4 years and 330 days ago)One good kick and the one on the left is doomed.
(4 years and 332 days ago)A chocolate gun.
(5 years and 47 days ago)Like that shadow effect on this portrait. Lovely
(5 years and 55 days ago)Looks good...have you thought about a frame?
(5 years and 57 days ago)In case anyone wonders,the link for source 2: Skin shows a flickr page with a copyright. That image can't be copyrighted by the flickr author since he doesn't own it and he does mention it's free to use. It is available on several sites including this one:
(5 years and 378 days ago)http://www.grafamania.net/clipart/backgrounds/60443-tekstury-old-book-textures-2.html
Very nice chop.
(5 years and 379 days ago)Oh man.. this one really makes me sick! In a VERY GOOD WAY.. .if that makes sense?.. hehehe... GREAT JOB!!!!
(5 years and 381 days ago)Ninja turtle.. yeah i like this..
(5 years and 864 days ago)
(5 years and 875 days ago)Good image. If you didn't want to give him a motion blur, I might have made the speed lines just a bit more obvious, but it's OK like it is. Good luck!
(5 years and 875 days ago)Cutie Patootie
(5 years and 875 days ago)You're source link URLs are correct but you put them in the wrong box. The URL goes in the top box, the bottom box is for text as in the description and/or credit for the source.
(5 years and 875 days ago)