Ahem...try a fish.

Interesting concept, but it's 15th century armor.

The rabbit looks fake. Try a fish.

He's walking on water, and the propeller isn't spinning? (And the moon is never in front of the clouds, but I guess you can claim surrealism on this one...).

Congrats!

Congrats!

Congrats again!

Congrats!

No problem...maybe try reducing their opacity now. GL author.

Hair is much better, but now the water droplets look like they're crawling up her face.

Author, you need to post links to the sources used.

Might be better to have the water match the outline of her original hair at top.

Hot babe!

The shadows Alan mentioned are too heavy now, but the concept is good.

Glad you could revise and resubmit. This is good work! "

Too much red in the background kills contrast & depth.

Please post source link for flames.

Some edges (birds. antelopes) are jagged & could use some softening. Otherwise not bad.

Great manipulation! You might want to soften some edges, like around the insides of the eyes, the lower edge of the face, and the lips. Might also be better to provide a background instead of the rectangles. IMHO they're kinda distracting. Still, high quality stuff.

Totally abstract means nothing representational...hence, no guy in a boat. Check the definition in the contest description.

There's no source for the figure in the boat. In any case an abstract image should include no representational images. There is now a definition of "abstract" in the contest description., which is deliberately titled TOTALLY abstract.

Please fix link 1.

Congrats again!

Congrats!

Congrats!

Congrats!

Might be better if he had something to stand on, but good image.

Not a bad idea. Hi res is pretty messy.

GL author!

Good job on the skin. I think I might like this better with the human eyes, though.

Amazing use of the source elements. Shows a lot of creativity & imagination.

Really good work here, might be better to blur some hard edges. GL author.

Nicely done, and the SBS is very helpful.

The image of the woman is very low res and has a white outline. Doesn't help the quality of your image.

Way better!

Torso part of the shadow would be thicker, otherwise a good image.

You just made me eat my words in the comments section...good work!

From the guidelines: 5.4. No External Source used in your Entry: In this case, your entry must have a step by step provided showing how the entry was made. For level 10- contests, a written SBS in the description is also ok (for simple entries), unless a moderator asks you to add a pictorial SBS.

Congrats!

Good one, congrats!

Congrats...good thing there are no points off for spelling!

Love your step 12.

ROFL..."cock"?...I assume you mean Clock.

Try to fix the reflection of the shoes. It should start underneath them. The reflection of the basketball should have the same shading at left. (On second look I'd tone down the reflection of the bleachers, too). Otherwise it's a good image.

Rotate the shoes about 30 degrees counter clockwise to get the perspective right and you'll have a good image.

Might have been better if the original images were in their original colors.

Link 2 doesn't lead to mailbox used.

http://www.airgunz.altervista.org/Enciclopedia/Bindella_ventilata_Colt_Python.jpg is from a blog, and not usable.

Why keep the 4 legs? Might want to remove the reversed lettering and provide links to the red tubes & the flying bird too.