This is cool. Please upload the high res so that we can see the gallery images better.

I really like it but I would have liked to see the man repeated in the photos on the wall. I think I understand why you didn't do that. But the angle at which he is standing is very interesting and gives the image personality that I think would have been neet if it were repeated. But it's cool the way it is, too. I like how it's a little different than the way the others are set up. The movement being horizontal instead of moving away from the viewer. Nicely composed.

Not sure if this fits into the category, sun is shining on the left side of his body but the light is coming from the right bottom side of the gallery :S

it would have been better if he was in the picture

author.. please supply your sources (even if it is your own picture you have to put a copy of it into your step by step) very on theme image.. hate to see it pulled on a silly technicality

(just go to my stuff, my contests and click the add SBS thingy on the bottom) and up load the original pic and/or source

IT's a shame you couldn't get a more in focus picture. Yeah as Drivenslush said, just stick the pic in your SBS and you will be fine. You have to make an SBS anyways so the mods won't remove it.

nice idea

There should be some color change as the mouths recede...

Applied a adjustment mask to each decreasing layer to darken the colour by -20 per layer -- thanks CMYK for the suggestion

pretty good representation of theme.... I think you can fit one more big mouth in there.

Nice idea...good luck

Added a few more layers

It does look like you could put one more in there.

Don't see the Droste effect here...

look harder...it's in the entire piece... I just didn't want it predictible

Sorry, but I agree with CMYK. Even if it IS there, it's extremely hard to see. And I still don't see it.

I think it's stretching the theme, but i believe the droste effect is there.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_NpINLHeo8rM/RuaF7vjOUDI/AAAAAAAAGb0/xiwUX-R-RaA/s400/Droste+effect+%2819%29.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_fEglkkU__oM/R5z2IZlHTDI/AAAAAAAABWA/VnjHy0yWgKc/s400/Droste.jpg

Even the original Droste took it's liberties (notice the differences in the miniature images and the added on effects)

http://blog.e-lek.nl/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/droste-big.jpg

Taking partial droste effects and then manipulating them into Mobius Strip feels was my goal...

And for those who know my work should understand that the first image I ever made that won a contest was a droste so I HAD to think out of the box... which is where all my work usually resides

I completely agree with you author.. great thinking

i don't agree at all author... those examples you showed to prove your point actually hurt your point... they all have some type of symmetry to them, yours is more chaotic... part of the infinite nature of the effect is it's symmetry...

I see many strips of lion heads that go on infinitely, but that just isn't a very good representation of the droste to me, whether it's correct or not. Sorry, this is in my honest opinion.

Once again I used a droste Mobius combination (you can see I could have easily made it into typical droste as remenants are every where) but my goal was other than that.. the samples I showed are showing the PARTS of the droste effect I used to make the image. (It's quite obvious that I know what droste is as to convert this into typical droste would take a few minutes) granted its more recursive.. but that was my goal to scatter droste not make on whole picture of droste (as I clearly could have done) just my Idea (this is fun)

I used Droste ideas to create a Car-touche image with floating droste as method (if you cropped the picture down, you'd have droste all over the place)

I don't really see it either.... sorry.....

EDIT: still like ya though

Not sure if this fits, not sure if i hate it or disgust it.

Author, if you have to write such a lengthy explanation just to prove people that it's good, then is it really?

Lengthy???.. hehehe.. I once wrote a 20 page term paper on the relative styles of Blake vs. Matisse (spent three whole pages on hands alone.. LOL) and I wasn't trying to PROVE anything.. just explaining my point of view .. and I never ever said it was good.. art just is (the good part is in the eye of the beholder)

Yes I suppose you are right. I suppose my eye is just not fit, then. XD

Nice work...gl