friiskiwi wrote:OK, I see where you are coming from, but I have often felt that the final percent has often been too low. So if it goes up for good entries that is good. Lets just hope that people will also vote a lot lower for BAD entries.

I've always voted low on bad entries. That's why I don't have 5000 VP, but lately I've managed to get on the best voter list. Maybe that says something about the revised system. One can only hope.

You have to overcome, adapt and improvise troops. Something strange is happening at PXL...Lord have mercy, I never thought I'd see the day that CMYK46 is on the best voters list. Ya'll watch out, that could throw the voting way off.

Or maybe things are finally getting better. No need to freak out, Loyd. Relax.

Oh KY I'm not freaking out and have to say, I am very relaxed.

lchappell wrote:Oh KY I'm not freaking out and have to say, I am very relaxed.

Who could tell.

Jeeeeez some people can't take a joke.

Consider the source....

Amazing. Amanda spelled everything right.

Loyd I'm sure you were just kidding Bob, I've been known to poke fun at him in the past but always just good-natured ribbing. He speaks his mind and I always know where he stands even if I may disagree at times but that doesn't mean I'm right and he's wrong, I respect his opinion. I agree with voting low for bad entries and I do, my VP is still not at 5000 either but I won't compromise my votes just to get higher VP, I don't like the way VP is calculated but I have no solution to offer so I'll continue to climb slowly to the max mark.
Yes Amanda, "consider the source", Bob is a professional artist and teacher with a very good knowledge of Photoshop and a long time membership going back to the PST days. I would consider his votes to be backed by this knowledge and know how making them more accurate than the general gut reaction voting we see.

There was nothing said about what he does in his personal life omg.... It was that he couldnt take the joke.